Film scholar Daniel Fitzpatrick has curated the IFI and Experimental Film Club programme for September, and here he discusses its theme: Re-evaluating British
documentary cinema
British cinema has
always gotten a bad rap. Ever since Truffaut made the claim that the words
‘Britain’ and ‘cinema’ were incompatible it has struggled to be taken
seriously. For Truffaut and many others this was a cinema that was “boring”,
lacked “enthusiasm, zeal and impetus”; it was a cinema that reflected “a
submissive way of life”. Britain ’s
cinema has been continuously dismissed for being dull, safe and ‘realistic’, in
the pejorative use of the term, but this screening of short films taken from
various points within Britain ’s
history of documentary film production quickly puts paid to those claims. What
is revealed instead is an evolving tradition of experimentation and innovation.
It is a history full of contradictions and often apposite positions. The Free
Cinema movement for example, and its figurehead Lindsay Anderson, rejected
outright the influence of John Grierson and the formative British documentary
film movement, opting instead for a low budget form with no ties to industry or
government and little or no editorialising commitment. Their film O Dreamland (1953) is included here. The
film was shot on, what was then, newly affordable 16mm stock and it takes us on
an almost hallucinatory trip through the Margate funfair, taking in, among
other things, a terrifying cackling clown and a ‘Torture Through The Ages’
exhibit.
The Free Cinema
movement took their primary inspiration from Humphrey Jennings, often
considered the true poet of British documentary cinema. Jennings films stripped away everything that
was deemed unnecessary in the documentary form, replacing
the narrative voice with a collage of sounds that far more effectively captured
the specifics of a time and place. Included in this programme is his film Spare Time. Originally created for the
New York World Fair of 1939, it offers us a picture of Britain at work and at
play in the interwar period. This deeply evocative film also reflected Jennings
involvement with the Mass Observation movement, removed as it was from the
kinds of editorialising and condescension that often dogged documentary
cinema and its engagement with the ‘working classes’.
Len Lye Trade Tattoo (1937)
Going back to British
documentary’s formative period and John Grierson’s reign as head of both the
Empire Marketing Board and later the GPO Film Unit we find here an equally
dazzling embrace of formal experimentation and playful innovation. Within his
stated objective of making films that would speak directly to the masses, that
would educate and inform, Grierson managed to surround himself with a truly
eclectic group of creatives, many of whom were drawn from an emergent European
avant-garde. These
would include Alberto Cavalcanti, Len Lye (two films by Lye are included in
this programme), Norman McLaren (his short Love
On The Wing is featured here), Basil Wright and Edgar Antsey. These
filmmakers often truly functioned as a collective with various
influences present across a wide number of films. The films themselves,
particularly those included here, were full of ideas, highly adventurous, and
certainly never dull.
Hans Richter Every Day (1929)
This programme
also includes Hans Richter’s Every Day (1929),
a scarcely seen film which features a rare screen appearance by the great
Russian filmmaker Sergei Eisenstein. The film depicts a day in the life of an
increasingly industrialised and mechanised existence. Geoffrey Jones’ film Locomotion (1975), which also
effectively combines human and machinic rhythms, is a masterpiece of creative
editing, and it closes out this exciting programme.
The IFI & Experimental Film Club’s N or NW: Experimental Lineages within British Documentary Cinema will
take place on September 25th at 18.30. BOOK NOW.
No comments:
Post a Comment